The policy allows inline scripts to run
Updated
38% of the 238 domains we could check get a warning for this. Sample: the first 1,000 domains by rank in the Majestic Million, checked on 2026-10-12. How we measured
What this check looks for
The policy lets the browser run script written directly into the page. That is the exact form injected code takes, so this removes most of the policy's value.
Why it matters
Cross-site scripting works by getting script into the page's HTML. A policy that permits inline script permits precisely that, so the protection against the most common attack is switched off.
When the check passes, your report says: “The policy blocks inline scripts”.
What it costs your score
When this check fails it removes 10 points from your Web security score, before the status, confidence and repeat multipliers are applied. Web security carries a weight of 8 in the overall score.
It shares the web-security.csp family ceiling of 30 points: however many findings that family produces, together they cannot remove more than that from Web security. One underlying problem showing up in several places is still one problem.
- Severity
- medium
- Default confidence
- confirmed
- Status when triggered
- warn
- Deduction
- 10 points
- Family cap
- web-security.csp · 30
- Category
- Web security
- Module
- Web security headers
- Fix owned by
- user
- In the ruleset since
- 2026.09
How to fix it
Allow inline script only by a per-request nonce or a hash — not by 'unsafe-inline', and not by leaving scripts ungoverned.
Allowing inline script allows the exact form an injected script takes.
Generate a random nonce per response and put it in the header and on each legitimate
<script>.Add
'strict-dynamic'so scripts those scripts load are trusted without an allow-list.Keep
'unsafe-inline'in the list only as the documented fallback for old browsers — modern ones ignore it once a nonce is present.Move inline event handlers such as
onclick=into script: a nonce cannot be put on an attribute.
How to confirm it worked
curl -sSI https://‹host›/ | grep -i content-security-policy
A named slot like ‹domain› — and the braces left in the configuration below — is filled in with your own values when this rule appears on a report.
Remediation by platform
add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; script-src 'nonce-‹random›' 'strict-dynamic'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'" always;<IfModule mod_headers.c>
Header always set Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; script-src 'nonce-‹random›' 'strict-dynamic'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'"
</IfModule>header {
Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; script-src 'nonce-‹random›' 'strict-dynamic'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'"
}Rules → Overview → Create rule → Response Header Transform Rule → Set static → Content-Security-Policy = default-src 'self'; script-src 'nonce-‹random›' 'strict-dynamic'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'
(Dashboard path as at 2026-09; Cloudflare reorganised these pages and may again.)The
alwaysflag matters: without it nginx omits the header on error responses, which are exactly the ones an attacker aims for. Note also that anyadd_headerin alocationblock discards everyadd_headerinherited from the server block.Shown because the response identified Apache. Put it in the virtual host rather than .htaccess: .htaccess is re-read on every request, and
Header always setthere runs too late for responses the server generates itself.A Transform Rule adds the header at Cloudflare's edge, so it applies only to responses that reach visitors through Cloudflare. An origin that is reachable directly — by IP, or through a DNS record that is not proxied — still serves the response measured here without it. Setting it at the origin covers both paths.
Technical detail
‹detail›.
Note what does *not* trigger this: 'unsafe-inline' alongside a nonce or a hash is a deliberate backwards-compatibility shim, and CSP Level 3 §6.7.3.2 makes browsers that understand nonces ignore it. Only an 'unsafe-inline' with no nonce or hash to supersede it is reported here, because only that one is actually in force. A policy that sets none of script-src-elem, script-src-attr, script-src or default-src governs no inline script at all, and blocks none: that is reported here as a note rather than a deduction, because csp-missing already fails the policy for it and the gap is charged once. This rule is about scripts alone: 'unsafe-inline' on the style side is reported by its own, lower-priced rule, because a style cannot run code.
Standards and references
Test this on your domain
Run the check that produces this finding, on its own, against any domain.